What Bill Gates thinks about the Apple Tablet

Posted in Funny | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Kyle Bass Interview

-Fannie and Freddie paid 200 million in campaign contributions to 350 politicians in the last 10 years

-Total loses to Fannie and Freddie portfolios will sum to roughly 350-450 billion.

-Taxpayer footing the bill, no losses in public markets and bondholders.

-US government is more converned with protecting foreign investors than the taxpayers.

-If government is lending, cut out the middleman.

-Japan has no way out 1.4% cost of capital, if funding cost goes up 250 basis points, it will swallow all government budget.

-Only silver lining is that the US can see the outcome if we choose that path.

Posted in Economics | Tagged | Leave a comment

Branding Examples

Example 1: Polo clothing: Puts the logo on the product. Badge of quality.

Example 2: Salesforce.com software application: Leads, Opportunities, Accounts, etc. are color coded. When viewing each category, we are reminded of our place inside the software application by the familiar colors.

Posted in Marketing | Leave a comment

Lessons from Costco

Costco sells off of pallets. A couple differences between Stoneyard.com dealers and Costco is the lighting, the indoor warehouse, and most importantly, the product labeling on the pallets and around the individual products.

We can either train our extended salespeople or we can make it super easy to learn (and ultimately sell or buy) our products.

Why I like Costco Analogies: According to the analyst reports, the customer base skews wealthier than the competition.

Two kinds of customers, the hunters: best deals, best prices, aggressive shopping, and the gatherers: take what is easy, within reason.

Stoneyard.com has lots of information to educate: All natural, individual stones not panels, affordable, 5 styles, traditional, reclaimed, low carbon, historic — how do we communicate though?

Posted in Marketing | Leave a comment

Napkin Inspiration

Union Oyster House- America's Oldest Restaurant

Union Oyster House- America's Oldest Restaurant

Posted in Marketing | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Examples of visual stories

6 excellent videos to choose from

http://www.freshminds.com/animation/alan_watts_theater.html

-Gerald

Posted in Links | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Commentary on value

The way society becomes wealthier is through productivety improvements. When we can do more for less, we have more resources (time and money) left over. We get richer.

Let’s assume your village doesn’t have a truck, you take out a loan to buy one, and now you bring produce to market. This loan is a benefit to society. The lender gets repaid with interest, the borrower has access to new markets, etc etc.

Two perspectives on borrowing and lending are that both feel richer. The borrower feels richer: I have a truck to travel around with. The lender feels richer: I have collateral plus the interest and principal payments.

However let’s assume we upgrade this truck to a luxury model and it makes the driver more comfortable on the ride, but the capacities are the same. Lets also assume the price is much higher than the basic truck. This would be a scenario where this loan is not adding to society’s wealth.

This in many ways is an example of the way in which huge amounts of debt in the world are potentially deflationary. Current estimates of public + private debt in the US to be around 50 trillion dollars. As the world develops, the marginal returns of productiveity on that debt decreases. Think micro finance in Bangladesh. When people are really poor, a loan of 200 dollars is really helpful. Buy livestock, plow the field, manageable debt payments, etc etc. High return from small dollar amounts. If a wealthy US citizen uses much larger quantities of debt to buy a luxury truck or a larger house, this doesn’t make him or her more productive. This is one of the problems with having 50 trillion in debt. It takes a long time to pay off, and it doesn’t go anywhere soon.

While the gut reaction to reading about 800 billion dollar bailouts is that “the government is debasing the value of our money by just printing it,” this is an incomplete analysis.

First off, the total losses on the stock and real estate bubbles are somewhere in the neighborhood of 20 trillion dollars. If you thought you had 200,000 USD in your 401k plan, and the stocks went to 120,000 USD, you really did lose 80k. Likewise with the value of real estate. It turns out that despite 60 years of no more than a 2% drop (1991) in real estate prices, we have shattered the illusion that real estate is a stable commodity. It could well continue a slow and gradual decline, particularly in market segments that are overbuilt relative the potential market demand for such property.

Remember, for every decline or loss, a bank is even more apprehensive about loaning out new money. Creditworthiness definitions change (Citibank raised 2 million cardholders to a 30% interest rate on Credit Cards – many if not all are current on payments). Any losses also shrink the supply of money to loan back out. Lastly, cash stimulus and welfare merely maintain the status quo. They essentially keep peoples’ heads above water, but essentially the government spending 1 trillion on stimulus can’t possibly cause inflation in the near term. (debatable though 5 or 10 or 25 years down the line)

This relates to value because the issue I have with the massive leverage is that all of the borrowing and debt can feel like inflation and prosperity depending on the perspective. However, these folks that borrowed excessively will likely take many many years before it becomes apparent.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Dated Commentary (2)

This post is a follow on to my August 4, 2009 post regarding predictions in the capital markets.

I am currently reading: Steve Keen. I have yet to purchase his critique of Keynesian economics titled Debunking Economics published 2001, however his blog: www.debtdeflation.com/blogs is brilliant. I especially enjoyed this appearance.

Also following: Hugh Hendry, Mish Shedlock, and Peter Schiff. Peter Schiff seems to be changing his stance and now argues that there will be major deflation, and adds the caveat that this wil be when measured in Gold. I am starting to loose my conviction in the value of Gold as money through this credit stress we are experiencing and will continue to experience in the next few years. I think gold is one of the big uncertainties in my mind right now, but the major risk I see to owning gold is that it performs inverse to the US Dollar, and I ultimately believe the USD will at some point strengthen as more global deflation becomes apparent and as further economic weakness eventually leads to a commodities long squeeze.

Currently subscribing to: US Treasury bond newsletters. I see the bond yield rising in the near term, particularly until January 2010 and my target will be yield increases of 2% from now to then. Maybe the panic on the dollar will overshoot even that target, and maybe by a large amount if the dollar continues to weaken dramatically.

However, looking forward three key elements will bring deflation to the forefront of investors minds in 2010:

1) Rising tax rates. Now is the absolute worst time to be taking cash out of the economy due to the burden of servicing debt obligations in the midst of popping asset bubbles. Yet Democrats are plunging ahead on a soak the rich agenda under the guise of healthcare reform. This will primarily hit small business (the engine of job creation) due to the way many file taxes. It will also be a reason for further drops in private employment rolls.

2) Further declines in the real estate market. Due to the 5 year rollover cycle of commercial property investments (the property bubble of 2005 means debt rollover will not trigger widespread bank foreclosures until 2010, 2011, and 2012. Combined with continued declines in the residential sector. Patrick.net continues to be the best resource for enlightenment about residential real estate if you are not there yet.

3) Commodities bubble collapsing. The commodities bubble may very well be just igniting, in which case its eventual reversal (due to the lack of scarcity in the supply/demand equation) very well might overtake Stocks (circa 2001) and Real Estate (circa 2005) in catastrophic potential. Nevertheless, I do not forsee commodities like oil and gold igniting because the fundamentals of supply and demand are not there. Simply rolling over contracts is a very pricey game and therefore the safe money to be made is in storage. This does not bode well for an economy in recession where the marginal demand is weak. Copper low in December 09 was roughly 1.5 $/lb, and it is back to roughly 3. Same for Oil. It bottomed out most recently at 30, and I was predicting it would get to the 20s, however it is back into the 70s. These price levels are unsustainable because particularly with Oil, it crimps the American driver’s willingness to operate. Combined with further weakness in the employment market, the crimping of marginal demand, will lead to greater rising stockpiles and an eventual long squeeze.

Other factors to incorporate:
-China does not want the currency to rise
-US savings will continue to rise

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Stoneyard.com

My view everyday:

Stoneyard.com in the press

Stoneyard.com in the press

Posted in Links | Tagged | Leave a comment